This post, by Terry Odell, originally appeared on her blog on 1/7/13.
Authors want to see lots of reviews for their books. Why? Reviews and star ratings can move a book up or down the visibility charts at the e-book stores. Some promotion sites won’t consider a book unless it has over 15 reviews with a 4.5 star average. But are they really reviews if they’re written by readers and not professional reviewers? Some folks just leave a number of stars and that’s it. Others write “book reports” and tell the whole story, including giving away critical plot points. But no matter what, the sites want you to assign a number of stars to your review.
What do the stars mean?
At Amazon, this is what you see if you hover over each star.
1. I hate it
2. I don’t like it
3. It’s OK
4. I like it
5. I love it
At Barnes & Noble it’s this:
1. Poor
2. Below Average
3. Good
4. Very Good
5. Exceptional
Goodreads uses the following guidelines:
1. Didn’t like it
2. It was OK
3. Liked it
4. Really liked it
5. It was amazing.
Now, there’s a big difference, in my opinion, between “I hate it” and “Didn’t like it.” I’d also contend there’s a difference between “Exceptional” and “Amazing.” But one thing Goodreads and Amazon have in common is that they’re asking for opinions. Personal reactions to the book, which often have nothing to do with the quality of the writing. Barnes & Noble’s guidelines lean more toward content.
The reviews on these book sites are reader ‘reviews’ and many of those who post them have no idea what a ‘review’ means. Personal example. I noticed a one star review for Rooted in Danger. Since the book received a starred review from Publishers Weekly (which are professional reviews, not reader reviews), I wondered what this reader found so terrible. The review said, “All the authors other books are available in digital format, but this one is only hard cover.” Is that a book review? Hardly. Neither is the “the book took two weeks to get to me” or “the cover was ripped.”
Read the rest of the post on Terry Odell’s blog.