Twitter Chats For Writers

This article, from freelance writer and illustrator Debbie Ridpath Ohi, originally appeared on her Inkygirl.com site. It is reprinted here in its entirety with her permission, but as it is updated frequently, we strongly recommend you bookmark the source article and revisit it from time to time. Debbie is best known for her Inkygirl comics, which are geared to writers.

It took me a while to check out a chat on Twitter because I figured it would be complicated, and I lacked the time to learn a new user interface. To my surprise, it was MUCH simpler than I expected…and a lot of fun!

Twitter Chats For Writers

(Updated by @inkyelbows on August 24, 2009)

Compact writer chat schedule (for details, read further down on page):
EVERY DAY: #amwriting, #writegoal, #writingparty plus others (see hashtag list below)
SUNDAYS: #writechat
MONDAYS: #litchat, #journchat
TUESDAYS: #kidlitchat
WEDNESDAYS: #litchat, #memoirchat, #wnw, #editorchat
THURSDAYS: #poetry, #dnchat
FRIDAYS: #platformchat, #litchat, #scifichat
SATURDAYS: #ScreenwritingSaturday

If you’ve never tried a Twitter chat, here are some tips to help you get started:

What IS a Twitter chat?

A chat on Twitter basically consists of people making posts that include a particular hashtag (words that start with ‘#’). To read posts made in a chat, you just search for that hashtag in Twitter. Here’s a sample search for the hashtag ‘#writechat.’

If all you want to do is monitor a chat and not say anything, that’s all you need to know. You’ll need to refresh the page to see updated posts.

If you want to say something in the chat, just post your comment to Twitter, but make sure the hashtag is included somewhere in your post so other people in the chat will see it. That’s the simplest way to participate in a chat so if you’re in a hurry, there’s no need to read further.

However, it can be a hassle to have to manually add the chat hashtag each time you post (and inevitably you forget) and also to keep refreshing the search result page. To make Twitter chats a more pleasant experience, there are many Twitter chat tools available (for free!); I’ve included a list of some later in this page.

Where to find Twitter chats for writers

These dates/times are accurate as of today, as far as I know. Info may change, however, so be sure to verify this info by checking the hashtag before attending your first chat. Info was excerpted from Meryl.Net’s great list of chats, this Google Docs chat list, Twitter, and comment posts. If you run a regular Twitter chat for writers that is not listed below, please post info in the comments at the bottom.

Every day (”slow chats”)

The following are more motivational groups rather than scheduled Twitterchats, but are still a great way of meeting other writers on Twitter.

#amwriting: Every day
See @johannaharness’s FAQ.
When: anytime.

Other hashtags of interest to writers: #authors, #pubtip, #nanowrimo, #writegoal (post your daily writing goals and get inspired by reading goals by other writers),#wip, #wordcount, #writetip, #novelists, #writers, #writing, #writingparty.

Reminder: Hashtags are useful in filtering Twitter posts, but DON’T OVERUSE THEM. Here’s a great post about how to use and not use hashtags.

Scheduled

#writechat: Sundays
Topic or topics are usually announced at the beginning of the chat.
Moderated by @WritingSpirit
PST: 12-3 pm
MST: 1-4 pm
CST: 2-5 pm
EST: 3-6 pm

#journchat: Mondays
PST: 5-8 pm
MST: 6-9 pm
CST: 7-10 pm
EST: 8-11 pm

#kidlitchat: Every Tuesday starting July 21st
Craft & business of writing for young people, board books up through YA. Topic or topics are usually announced at the beginning of the chat.
Moderators: @gregpincus, @bonnieadamson
PST: 6 pm
MST: 7 pm
CST: 8 pm
EST: 9 pm

#litchat: Monday, Wednesday, Friday
Mission is to connect readers with books and authors.
Moderator: @litchat.
Transcripts on blog.
PST: 1-2 pm
MST: 2-3 pm
CST: 3-4 pm
EST: 4-5 pm

#WNW:
Wednesdays
Wednesday Night Writer. Fantasy/Fiction discussion group on Twitter.
Moderator: @_decode_ .
PST: 5-8 pm
MST: 6-9 pm
CST: 7-10 pm
EST: 8-11 pm

#memoirchat: Every other Wednesday at 8 p.m. EST.
Moderator: @alexisgrant
For writers of memoir.

#editorchat: Wednesdays
…A place for professional writers and editors who use the micro-blogging service Twitter to discuss how best to help one another.
Moderator: @LydiaBreakfast
PST: 5:30-8 pm
MST: 6:30-9 pm
CST: 7:30-10pm
EST: 8:30-11pm

#poetry: Thursdays
We talk poetry. Readers, writers, and all others encouraged to join. Moderator: @gregpincus.
PST: 6-7 pm
MST: 7-8 pm
CST: 8-9 pm
EST: 10-11 pm

#dnchat: Thursdays
For those who write fiction for online publication. “DN stands for DigitalNovelists.com, which is the platform most of us in the group publish on, but all web fiction writers and fans of web novelists are welcome.”
PST: 8-9 pm
MST: 9-10 pm
CST: 10-11 pm
EST: 11 pm-12 am

[Publetariat Editor’s Note: also check out #followreader, on Thursdays at 1pm PST, 2pm MST, 3pm CST and 4pm EST. Each week features a different topic of interest to authors, publishers and readers]

#scifichat: Fridays
Moderated by: @DavidRozansky. Follow @scifichat for schedule changes and announcements.
PST: 11-2 pm
MST: 12-2 pm
CST: 1-3 pm
EST: 2-4 pm

#platformchat: Fridays.
Moderator: @thewritermama.
PST: 11-12 am
MST: 12-1 pm
CST: 1-2 pm
EST: 2-3 pm

#scifichat: Fridays
Moderated by: @DavidRozansky
PST: 11-1 pm
MST: 12-2 pm
CST: 1-3 pm
EST: 2-4 pm

#ScreenwritingSaturday:
Saturdays (all day)
Moderator: @UncompletedWork.

To see other chats, please visit Meryl.Net’s list of chats and What The Hashtag.

USEFUL TWITTER CHAT CLIENTS

You don’t have to have a special Twitter chat tool to participate in a Twitter chat, but it can make things easier.

TweetChat: This is my favourite so far. Very simple to use. Web-based, just enter the hashtag you want to follow, enter the chat room, and you don’t have to keep adding the hashtag to every post because TweetChat does it for you.

TweetGrid: Also Web-based. You can participate in more than one chat at the same time but this means you have to enter the hashtag each time you post to make sure it goes to the right room. I find it enough of a challenge keeping up with ONE chat and can’t imagine trying to participate in more than one, though.

TweetDeck: If you use this desktop app, then you can create a column that filters the hashtag/chat name.

Related sources:
Meryl.net’s article abou Twitter chat clients
10 Free Twitter Chat Tools

FOR THOSE NEW TO TWITTER CHATS

Tweeting With Your Twitter Community: How To Participate In A Twitter Chat by Jeff Hurt
How to Join Twitter Chats from Meryl.net
How To Participate In A Twitter Chat

A FEW TWITTER CHAT TIPS

If you’re arriving after the chat has begun, try to catch up on older posts to find out what you missed. DON’T start posting right away — you may be interrupting a moderated chat with guest authors or editors, or there may be a particular theme or topic of discussion.

Don’t get angry if people seem to be ignoring your posts. In a crowded chat, posts often go by very quickly and people often miss reading some posts. System lag can also delay the public appearance of posts. Wait a little and then try re-posting.

I’ve found it handy to keep an extra window open, to monitor any “@” replies I may have missed seeing in the main chat window.

If you’re replying to someone’s comment, be sure to include that person’s account name in your post so they see it.

If you’re using a regular Web browser, include the proper chat name hashtag, or no one in the chat will see your post.

Proofread your tweet before posting.

Try to stay on topic, if there is a topic of discussion.

Don’t forget that if you have a protected Twitterfeed, people won’t be able to see your posts unless they’re following you. Consider opening a separate (and public) feed for chats.

If you use one Twitter account for regular posts as well as for chats, you may want to warn your followers that you’re about to participate in a chat and may therefore be posting a LOT for the next little while. Or you might consider having a separate account just for chats. Here’s how I tweet.

Even though the environment may seem intimate and casual, ALWAYS REMEMBER that your posts are public. You can always count on someone taking a screenshot of an embarrassing post before you have a chance to delete it, plus certain types of feeds will still retain your post even if you delete it. Never, ever post in anger; don’t forget what happened to Alice Hoffman.

Never post in anger. (see above) I know I keep harping on this, but I’ve seen far too many writers make this mistake and regret it later. If you want to disagree with someone, do so respectfully. Don’t let someone goad you into a flamewar. Also remember that people reading your Twitter page will only see your posts, and not the others in the discussion. These readers may include other authors, editors, and agents whose professional opinion of you may be altered for the worse, depending on what you post.

TWITTER CHAT ACRONYM PRIMER

I’m still learning the acronyms, but here are some you may come across in a Twitter chat for writers:

YA = young adult
MG = middle grade
UF = urban fantasy (thanks to @tom_hummer)
FWIW = for what it’s worth
LOL = laughing out loud
LMAO = laughing my ass off
RT = retweet (usually precedes the Twittername of the person who is being quoted or retweeted)
BFN = bye for now
TTFN = ta ta for now
BRB = be right back

Here are some other chat acronyms
Chat acronyms used in e-mail, IM and text messaging (includes handy search box)

FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO RUN A TWITTER CHAT

How to Run a Successful Twitter Chat (from Meryl.net)

FOR THOSE NEW TO TWITTER OR TWITTERCHATS:

10 Ways Twitter Can Help Writers by Debbie Ridpath Ohi
The Twitter Chat Experience – by Swan
What Tweetchats Can Do For You by Ami Spencer
Twitter FAQ: RT, HT, OH, ETC by Brent Ozar
Twitter 101: Clarifying The Rules For Newbies from SheGeeks.net.
The Beginner’s Guide to Twitter – by Michael Hyatt (CEO, Thomas Nelson)

When Novelists Sober Up

This article, from Tom Shone, originally appeared in The Economist’s More Intelligent Life summer ’09 magazine issue.

Writers who drink are old hat. But what about writers who quit drinking? Tom Shone has been studying them for his new novel …

From INTELLIGENT LIFE Magazine, Summer 2009

John Cheever was most unhappy to be picked up for vagrancy by the cops. “My name is John Cheever!” he bellowed. “Are you out of your mind?” Found sharing some hooch with the down-and-outs in downtown Boston, he was promptly admitted to Smithers Alcoholism Treatment Centre on Manhattan’s East 93rd Street, where he shared a room with a failed male ballet dancer, a delicatessen owner and a smelly ex-sailor. “The ballerina is up to his neck in bubble bath reading a biography of Edith Piaf,” he noted in his journal. He spent most of his time in group therapy correcting his counsellor’s grammar. “Displaying much grandiosity and pride,” they wrote in their notes. “Very impressed with self.” Eventually he fell silent. Four weeks later he emerged, shaky, fragile and subdued. “Listen, Truman,” he told Truman Capote. “It’s the most terrible, glum place you can conceivably imagine. It’s really really, really grim. But I did come out of there sober.”

He was the first American author of his rank to do so. Much ink has been spilled on the question of why so many writers are alcoholics. Of America’s seven Nobel laureates, five were lushes—to whom we can add an equally drunk-and-disorderly line of Brits: Dylan Thomas, Malcolm Lowry, Brendan Behan, Patrick Hamilton, Philip Larkin, Kingsley Amis, all doing the conga to (in most cases) an early grave. According to Donald Goodwin in his book “Alcohol and the Writer”:

Writing involves fantasy; alcohol promotes fantasy. Writing requires self-confidence; alcohol bolsters confidence. Writing is lonely work; alcohol assuages loneliness. Writing demands intense concentration; alcohol relaxes.

There is good reason to be suspicious of this: one could as easily come up with a similar list for firefighters, or nannies, the only real difference being that writers are more vocal about it—their denial more pithily expressed. As Philip Amis said of his father’s bottle-of-whisky-a-day habit: “He was Kingsley Amis and he could drink whenever he wanted because he bought it with his money, because he was Kingsley Amis and he was so famous.”

In America William Faulkner and Scott Fitzgerald were the Paris and Britney of their day, caught in the funhouse mirror of fame, their careers a vivid tabloid mash-up of hospitalisations and electroshock therapies. “When I read Faulkner I can tell when he gets tired and does it on corn just as I used to be able to tell when Scott would hit it beginning with ‘Tender is the Night’,” said Hemingway, playing the Amy Winehouse role of denier-in-chief. He kept gloating track of his friends’ decline, all the while nervously checking out books on liver damage from the library; by the end, said George Plimpton, Hemingway’s liver protruded from his belly “like a long fat leech”.

In fact none of these authors would write much that was any good beyond the age of 40, Faulkner’s prose seizing up with sclerosis, Hemingway sinking into unbudgeable mawkishness. When Fitzgerald went public about his creative decline in Esquire, in a piece entitled “The Crack Up”—a prototype for all the misery memoirs we have today—Hemingway was disgusted, inviting him to cast his “balls into the sea—if you have any balls left”. Today, of course, “The Crack Up” would be shooting up the besteller lists, and Fitzgerald would be sat perched on Oprah’s couch talking about his struggle and his co-dependent relationship with Ernest, proudly wearing his 90-day sobriety chip, but in the 1930s, the recovery industry, then in its infancy, was regarded by most with the enthusiasm of a cat approaching a bathtub.

“AA can only help weak people because their ego is strengthened by the group,” said Fitzgerald. “I was never a joiner.” Certainly, if what you’re used to is rolling champagne bottles down Fifth Avenue beneath the light of a wanton moon or getting into the kind of barfights that make a man feel alive, truly alive, the basic facts of recovered life—the endless meetings, the rote ingestion of the sort of clichés the writer has spent his entire life avoiding—are below prosaic. Richard Yates professed to find AA meetings impossibly maudlin: “Is just functioning living at all?” he moped, claiming he could not write a single sentence sober. His fall was even more vertiginous, and emblematic of the 1950s; like Kerouac, he was to write one masterpiece (“Revolutionary Road"), then nothing.

Only the advent of rehab, in the 1960s, interrupted this fall—enforced incarceration flattering the writer’s sense of drama, the Kafkaesque me-versus-the-system fable playing out in his head. John Berryman sat in rehab looking like a “dishevelled Moses”, his shins black and blue, his liver palpitating, reciting Japanese and Greek poets and quoting Immanuel Kant. When he found out the doctors around him were serious he buckled under, declaring himself “a new man in 50 ways!” and affecting an ostentatious “religious conversion” which he proceeded to pour into a series of poems to his Higher Power (“Under new governance your majesty”). Ten days after leaving he found he needed a quick stiff one to get the creative juices flowing again and downed a quart of whisky. “Christ,” was all he could say the next morning.

Second time around he got himself a sponsor named Ken, and tried prose, writing a novel about his recovery, called “Recovery”, which goes some way to explaining why the recent spate of bestsellers on the subject have been non-fiction. Pretentious and opaque, including “a bloody philosophy of both history and Existens, almost as heavy as Tolstoy”, Berryman’s book remains an object lesson in how not to recover, as Donald Newlove has pointed out:

Read the rest of the article on The Economist’s More Intelligent Life site.

Drawing Characters From Real Life

This article, from Barbara Samuel, originally appeared on the Writer Unboxed site on 5/27/09.

One of the best sources of fresh, original, authentic character development comes from the seas of real life.

As a young journalism student, one of my favorite tasks was to be assigned a feature on a professor or a student with an intriguing history or pursuit. I loved interviewing them, taking notes on whatever details seemed most intriguing.  What did they have on their desks?  What did that little repetitive circle of the arm have to say about them?  What details set this person apart from all others, what made her unique?  I wasn’t particularly interested in making anyone uncomfortable or uncovering some awful thing. I wanted to know who they were and what story they would tell me.

I learned that nearly everyone has a story they want to tell, some story that defines who they are, some moment they carry around day after day, year after year.  Even the worst criminals have some soft moment, a time before they became hardened to the pain of others.  Even the most saintly of church ladies have some moment of shame they cannot shake.

It’s fascinating.  

I didn’t spend long in the world of journalism, but my habit of collecting stories, gestures, clothing, histories, has continued apace.  My partner learned early that if I am exhausted, one way to perk me up is to take me into a new environment where there might be stories for me to harvest.  The old man at the drugstore in Albuquerque, the Frenchman with thickly furred, burly arms who drove us (much too fast!) around Normandy and took me to task for drinking coffee with my meal.  My partner calls my methods interrogation, but I prefer to think of myself as a student of human behavior.

The point is, all of the material goes into a giant closet in my imagination, a heady cache of fresh, unique details harvested right out of everyday life, ready for the telling later.  Not all at once, of course.  Characters are assembled like weavings, voice from here, a habit from there, gestures from somewhere else.  I might use the Frenchman’s arms and smoking and bluster to fashion a father in a small Colorado town.  I have sometimes lifted a person nearly whole cloth from life because it’s irresistible–the dashingly handsome Iranian who ran the local quick shop in my old neighborhood in Pueblo showed up in the Goddesses of Kitchen Avenue (a fact that pleased him mightily!).

More often, it’s a weaving of various things plucked out of that closet full of details.  I remember one afternoon listening to my late mother-in-law, who was grieving her mother, telling the story of her childhood and how she met her husband.  She was the daughter of a rich farmer in Jackson, Mississippi in the thirties. Her husband was an ambitious and charming day worker seeking work in the fields.  He came to the door for water, and she was smitten from that day forward.  That nugget of story made its way into the Goddesses of Kitchen Avenue, as the backstory of an older African American woman, Roberta, who is grieving her husband.  Roberta was the name of my friend Sharon’s mother, who could pray the world blue, and I used some of her gestures and kindnesses for the character of Roberta.  There was also a hefty helping of my grandmother in the character,  a woman of the same generation, and then my own embroidery from who-knows-where. Voila! A character was born.

Read the rest of the article on Writer Unboxed.

Here I am — warts and all!

I’m Richard L Sutton — Richie to my buddies, and much worse, sometimes.  I’m hoping to discover why my new personal pronoun, Indie Author is a good thing, among my peers and hopefully among the reader market.

I’ve been writing since before I left college in 1970, but I had to wear a lot of different hats, first. Finished my first novel 6 years ago, behind the cash register of our family business.  We moved that online in 2007 and now I don’t have any excuses left — it’s onwards and outwards.

My first novel, The Red Gate a 386 page historic fantasy set in 1912 Co., Mayo Ireland was published in April via CreateSpace and is available in their E-store, and on Amazon. I hope those who like a traditional family saga with a twist will take a look at the preview Amazon has posted and leave me some comments, especially after buying the book!

I’m also enjoying the communities on Litopia and Authonomy, where I have gotten some very good criticism and ideas for marketing. I look forward to some rousing dialog on these pages — sadly, I don’t tweet, though.  Truth be told, my eyes are too old to see those teeny, tiny buttons.

 

FREE Indie Publishing and Writing Tip Book by Edward C. Patterson

I am currently offering my book Are You Still Submitting Your Work to a Traditional Publisher? for FREE at Smashwords in various formats.

http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/316

Be sure to select the latest version (2009) – the earlier one has been superceded on Amazon, but on Smashwords they offer all versions.

This work has been flying off the shelf (and now that it’s free, they are zooming all over the place). It has 17 four and five star reviews (12 on Amazon.com). I’ve included the last one below.

Product Description
With the new and exciting world of Kindles and Print-on-Demand (POD), Independent Publishing is becoming an enticing choice and a viable alternative to traditional publishing. The old days of "self-publishing and vanity presses" are over. Indie Authors are giving readers a wide variety of quality reads in all genres. Are you unsure of how to go about it? Do you crave to know the best options? What are the pitfalls? From discussions of picking up the traditional process and bringing it home, to setting up files for Amazon’s Kindle and POD, "Are You Still Submitting Your Work to a Traditional Publisher?" provides tips and ideas, set-by-steps and coaching on quality control. Edward C. Patterson has successfully published eight Indie works with nine in the pipeline. In addition to the title article, this work includes three other craft discussions: "Writing Good Stories","The Novelization Process", and "Revision vs. Re-Vision", an extensive guide to revising a novel. Whether you are new to publishing or an established author, the opinions expressed and experiences shared in this book should stimulate your curiosity and provide answers to questions you might not have asked.

One review (others on Amazon, Smashwords and Authors Den)

Wish I had read this first! Review by  J. Chambers
     
Having recently published my first book for the Kindle and in paperback, I wish I had read "Are You Still Submitting Your Work To A Traditional Publisher?" first. Publishing digitally or for a publish-on-demand publisher isn’t rocket science, but it can be a daunting and downright intimidating process for a newbie. Mr. Patterson’s book would have saved me a lot of weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth!

"Are You Still Submitting Your Work To A Traditional Publisher?" lays out a simple step-by-step process for both digital publishing and print-on-demand publishing. In addition, the author covers the post-publishing steps to market your book and increase sales. I recently bought a book for $15 on this subject, and Mr. Patterson’s book is more thorough than that book.

The second part of the book is like a bonus, covering how to write. The author is obviously very experienced in writing, and he gives some valuable tips and examples based on his own writing.

If you’re even thinking about publishing a book, this book is a must-read and a bargain for the price.

Enjoy. Feedback (and reviews) welcome. Better still, get your novels out there.

Edward C. Patterson
Visit my Amazon Authors Page http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B002BMI6X8

Four Wonderful Tools For Writers In The Digital Era (That Aren't Word Processors)

This article, from Jeremiah Tolbert, originally appeared on his site on 5/11/09.

As a designer, I’m always stumbling across useful resources and tools online, but for whatever reason, I find fewer tools that really exist to help make writers’ lives easier.  That doesn’t mean they aren’t out there.  It just means you have to dig a little deeper.  Today, I thought I would share some tools that can make certain aspects of the writer’s life a tad easier.

1. Dropbox

If you’re anything like me, you don’t always remember to run your backups.  With recent computer troubles, I’ve been making a much bigger effort to backing up everything of importance.  About six months ago, I started using Dropbox and I haven’t looked back.

Dropbox is an online versioning and backup system.  You install dropbox on your windows or mac computer and everything in the folder called “My Dropbox” is constantly uploaded to the server.  When you make modifications, it keeps a record of these changes and you can go to the web interface and load older versions.  Accidentally overwrite a file?  Dropbox can save your butt.  It has saved me on more than one ocassion.

Even better, Dropbox can be installed on multiple computers, keeping your dropbox folder synced up to all of the machines.  Whether you’re on your office computer or your laptop, you will have access to your files.

Finally, Dropbox users can share folders with one another.  We use this feature extensively at Escape Artists to deal with our production files, contracts, and various business documents and resources.

My biggest concern when I first started using Dropbox was that it would constantly be uploading my 50+ megabyte photoshop files, and my bandwidth would be devoured.  It actually tracks the differences, though, and only uploads the changed bits.  I’ve never noticed Dropbox being a hog of my writing.

There’s a free 2 gigabyte account, which should be more than enough to protect your writing documents.   I pay for the 50/gb a year plan for $99 per year because I truck in larger files.    Dropbox is available for Mac, PC, and Linux.

2. Evernote

I work across 3 different computers, and keeping my research notes in an easy-to-access format, while maintaining flexiblity and a variety of formats, isn’t easy.  That is, until I discovered Evernote.  What I was looking for originally was productivity software to help myself implement the GTD method.  What I found instead was a very useful program for organizing all those little bits and pieces of things that I need to access from time to time.

Evernote works on a very simple system of notebooks and notes.  You can add tags, and just about any kind of media into a note.  You can clip entire webpages into a note, or just the URL.  You can make screen captures very easily.  And then the real power is, it’s constantly backing up your notes to the server, and syncing them with all machines you run it on.  There’s a usage limit for free accounts based on data transfer, but I’ve never even gotten halfway there.  I don’t tend to use much in the way of multimedia files though.

Not only do I use Evernote for sorting and keeping track of things like research notes, storynotes, and so on–I often start writing my blogposts there.  Any kind of document where the format isn’t necessary, that I want to be able to access from anywhere.  You can even record voice notes with the iPhone app and they will be synced to all your machines.  I used this feature to take down some notes on my novel project while I was driving across Kansas alone.  Very useful feature.

There are a few things about Evernote I do find lacking.  For one, you can’t sort notebooks into collapsible hierarchies.  I would really like to be organize my notes in a similar fashion to my email program.   You can kind of fake this with saved searches for tags and so on, but I don’t really need a more detailed system of organization than notebooks/folders.

Evernote is available on Mac, PC, and iPhone. It has a very nice web-based interface as well.  If you have an internet connection, you can get to your notes.

Read the rest of the article, including tools #3 and #4, on Jeremiah Tolbert’s site.

The Enchanted 15: Plot

This post, from Jennifer E. Pierce, originally appeared on her Just Jen blog on 8/4/09. In it, she proposes that there’s really only one ‘plot type’: protagonist overcomes obstacle.

Narrative is not an exclusively literary domain–narrative, according to Mark Turner ( The Literary Mind 1996), narrative pre-exists language and the structure of narrative is the way we begin to make sense of our world as a body who exists in time and space. 

 
Drama–which is the earliest form of the novel–is the essential motivator in teaching us to move, think, and express ourselves in language.  What is drama?  Drama is a protagonist overcoming an obstacle.  A baby sees a toy.  The baby imagines itself with the toy in its grasp.  But there is an obstacle–the space between the baby and the toy.  The baby must imagine itself overcoming the space between it and the toy in order to learn to crawl and overcome the obstacle between itself and the toy.  This is a cognitive schema known as SOURCE-PATH-GOAL.  ( Dora the Explorer uses this schema all the time and this is the secret to the show’s success.  The map repeats over and over: "River-bridge-Grandma’s house!")  
 
From that moment of triumph, conquering the space between herself and the toy across the room, the baby then begins to project that experience onto the world around it and it is through this that the baby begins to make the world intelligible.  This is the essence of story.  
 
So, concludes Turner, what was once consider the domain of optional literary considerations, is now understood to be the essential operation of mind.  The elements of plot are not exclusive to novels, plays, and movies.  They are the essential components of reality as we perceive it.  
 
Some people experience disappointment when they realize, in terms of plot, that there are no original plots.  Every story can find its roots in another story.  A lot of writers I know struggle to make their plots original, to find a story that hasn’t been told–but the struggle is fruitless.  The essential elements of plot remains the same.  Some say there are only  seven plots, others 30,  others 20.  But there is actually only one plot–and that is overcoming an obstacle.  

Once we grasp this essential idea–and the variants on this theme–it shouldn’t disappoint, it should actually free you.  Establish the obstacle and write against it.  Though I know most of you reading here are writing fiction and the application is obvious, this is even so of non-fiction.  The best writing establishes an obstacle and overcomes it through argument and eloquence of expression.  The organization of the writing only falls into place if it is a step-wise process of overcoming a clearly defined obstacle.  

Read the rest of the post on Just Jen.

Writing Voice: Unteachable… Essential…. Elusive. And… Paradoxical.

This article, from author and writing coach Larry Brooks, originally appeared on his Storyfix site on 8/14/09.

We are writers.  We must compose the songs we sing.  We must choreograph the dances we perform.  We must design what we ultimately seek to build.

We are unique in these things.  Composers need not carry a tune.  Choreographers need not perform.  Screenwriters and directors need not be actors or set designers.  Architects need not even be present as their creation is being built.  

But we, as writers, are alone with all dimensions of our craft.  We are the sole determinants of words as we compose, choreograph and design stories.  We are judged according to both, separate and together, on how their sum exceeds the whole of their parts.

Writing voice is but one of six core competencies we must come to know and seek to master.  Deficiency in any one of them bars us from what we seek to achieve.

With regard to voice, though, this is ironic if not paradoxical.  Because many come to the craft of writing for the sound of their own voice, if not the utter joy of it.  And yet – and here is the paradox – it is at once the most likely of the elements that will bar us from the inner circle of the published, while being least among the criteria that allows us entry to it.

Allow me to explain.  It takes an agent or an editor many dozens of pages to determine the merits of your story.  It takes only a few pages to assess the rhythm and melody of your writing voice.  Those first pages expose the writing as that of a professional, someone who is publishable… or not.  If it compels, if it flows or doesn’t overwhelm, then it passes muster as acceptable.

And that’s all that is required of it.  Any allure of a stellar writing voice beyond that point is a case study in diminishing returns.

Because you don’t have to write like a poet to sell your story.  You simply need to write well enough to get through the door into a crowded hall full of storytellers.

From then on, your story is what determines your fate.  Little if nothing else matters.

So many writers focus on their words.  As they should if their writing voice has not yet matured and found its unique pitch.  If it even remotely smacks of awkwardness or the timidity of a neophyte.  If it tries too hard.  

And yet, despite that focus, such writers tread a solitary path, because voice is virtually impossible to teach.  All the grammar lectures and sentence modeling in the history of the world won’t get you there.

Writing voice must, in effect, be earned.  Discovered.  Grown into.  It must evolve into a signature cadence and tonality, with colors and nuance that imbue it with subtle energy and a textured essence of depth and humanity. 

Effortlessly.  Simply.  Cleanly.  Without the slightest hue of purple.

There is only one way to discover it.  You must write.  Practice.  Constantly.  Intensely.  Humbly and aggressively.  And you must do it for years if that’s what it takes.  Because it refuses to be rushed. 

Read the rest of the article on Storyfix.

How To Avoid The 11 Biggest Mistakes Of First-Time Authors

This article, from Roger C. Parker, originally appeared on the Personal Branding Blog on 8/5/09.

Writing, books, and personal branding go hand in hand. When you know how to write, and you use that power to write and promote a book, you can change your life.

Writing and promoting a book opens windows of opportunity–opportunities that would never otherwise show up. As a published author, you’re branded as an expert to new clients, prospects, and job opportunities. Your book becomes your business card, proving your expertise and professionalism. You can access experts you’d never, otherwise, be able to access.

You can leverage your book into whatever you want your life to be.

As Harry Beckwith wrote in The Invisible Touch, “If you want to change your life,”write a book.”

Success, however, is not guaranteed

Many first-time authors are not prepared for the possible land mines and pitfalls along the way. Many find writing a book to be a frustrating and unrewarding experience.

Fail to receive rewards

The following are the 11 biggest reasons many first-time authors fail to receive the rewards they expect:

1. Unrealistic expectations

Don’t expect to get rich off your book, even if it’s a success by publishing standards. The vast majority of books fail to earn out their advance.

Instead, right from the start, develop a personal marketing plan to leverage off your book.

Instead of trying to make money on the book itself, use your book to open doors, promote your credibility, and build relationships with readers. Know how you’re going to profit from your book through follow-up information marketing, providing sales and services, or seminars, worksheets, and paid speaking and training.

I’m amazed by the number of authors I’ve interviewed for who have told me they devote their publishing advances and royalties to charity, knowing that profits from book sales will never equal the profits from their own back-end products and services.

2. Writing without a contract

Never write a book without a signed contract. Instead, prepare a detailed book proposal and two sample chapters.

Publishers are increasingly selective the titles they accept. Often, less than 1 in 50 titles proposed are published. Worse, most books change during the writing and editing process.

Writing a book that isn’t accepted is not a good use of your time!

3. No agent

It is essential that you be represented by a literary agent.

Publishers rarely accept unsolicited book proposals. Unsolicited proposals are frequently returned unread or are simply discarded. The right agent will know exactly which publishers might be interested in your book.

More important, publishing contracts frequently contain “boilerplate” text that can sabotage your writing career before it begins. You must have an agent who knows what to look for and is able to negotiate more terms.

[Publetariat Editor’s note: while it’s true that most of the largest publishing houses won’t accept unsolicited manuscripts, very many mid-sized, and most small, imprints will. Visit each imprint’s website to learn whether or not your unsolicited manuscript will be accepted. However, regardless of how your manuscript finds its way to an acquisitions person, when things get to the contract negotiations stage you must have an able and experienced representative at your side, whether in the form of a literary agent or an attorney well-versed in literary rights contracts.]

4. Weak titles

Titles sell books. The title of your book is like the headline of an advertisement. The title is the “headline” that helps you sell your project to acquisition editors as well as bookstore readers.

Successful titles stress the benefits readers will gain from your book. Successful titles arouse curiosity and offer solutions. They often include consonants and alliteration (repeated ”hard” sounds like G, K, P or T).

5. Title versus series

Don’t think “book,” think “brand.” Focus on a series of books rather than an individual title. Publishers want concepts that can be expanded into a series rather than individual titles.

Do it right, and your first book becomes your brand, the “shorthand” that identifies you. Think in terms of brands like Jay Conrad Levinson’s Guerrilla Marketing series which has provided him over thirty years of quality lifestyle, challenging clients, and speaking opportunities throughout the world…and still does.

Read the rest of the article, including points #6-11, on the Personal Branding Blog. Also see Roger C. Parker’s Resource Center for more great marketing tips and articles.

6 Reasons Why Every New Writer Needs To Be On Twitter

This article, from Caroline Smailes, originally appeared on her website on 8/12/09.

It seems that everywhere you turn writers are being told that they need to build an online platform. They need a blog, a website, a Facebook page and, perhaps most importantly, a twitter account.

Here are six reasons  I (@Caroline_S) have found twitter to be essential for new writers:

It is big and it is clever: The explosion in twitter users has made twitter the thing all the cool (mainly over 25s) ‘kids’ are doing. It’s new (ish) and to be honest its reputation as the best social media tool out there is well deserved. The simple fact that twitter is the latest trend is reason enough to get involved. The fact that is gives writers the chance to entice hundreds of new readers makes it, well…irresistible.

Conversation is King: Twitter’s biggest advantage is that it makes millions of people so damn accessible. Once a member of twitter, you can follow and interact with anyone else on the system. Now (for me) this isn’t about famous people, it’s about normal people and people that you can connect with and who you’re interested in. As a writer it allows you to make friends and build a following. However, it also allows you to interact with people that can help solve problems. For me, twittering isn’t about trying to get someone to buy my books, it’s about connecting and having a laugh. Need a bit of advice about grammar, or which publisher to approach or even the best type of dog food – twitter can help.

You might just bag yourself a book deal: A growing number of publishers and agents are using twitter. Most are open and ready to interact. This means that, for the first time, writers have the chance to skip the slush pile and go straight to the people that count. Build a relationship with the correct agent or publisher and you never know there might be a book deal in it for you.

Read the rest of the article on Caroline Smailes’ website.

Revelatory Sequencing

This article, from editor Alicia Rasley, originally appeared on Edittorrent on 7/27/09. In it, she explains how pacing and your choice of what to reveal, and when, can strengthen or weaken your fiction writing.

I’m reading a mystery where the victim is widely disliked, so there are lots of suspects. (I’m summarizing and paraphrasing here, but you’ll get the point.)

So the detective has just arrived at the scene and has said he’ll go tell the new widow that her husband is dead. He thinks that her reaction could tell him something.

The woman sees that he’s a policeman and stands up and says in exasperation, "I hope you’re not here to tell me my son has been arrested."
He says, "I have some bad news. Your husband has been murdered."

Next line:

She reacted with shock but not sorrow, and Yanif saw clearly that she didn’t love her husband. Could she have murdered him? He didn’t know. He just knew she wasn’t mourning his death.


Okay. We know she has a husband, the victim.
We know now that she has a son.

Now this is a big moment in the plot. The detective tells the widow, and she reacts in a way that puts her right at the top of the suspect list.

But I think the scene could have been made more emotional, more fun, with a bit of a diversion here. Let’s say the woman rises and says with exasperation, "I hope you’re not here to tell me my son has been arrested."
The detective — craft the dialogue carefully here, because my point is… draw it out. Take your time. Take it slow.
The detective replied, "No. But I have some bad news–"
And then he pauses.

Maybe you want him to draw a breath here. Maybe he’s pausing so that he can see her reaction to the news. But when he pauses, instead of waiting, the widow rushes in.

"No! Not my son! He’s not–"
And the detective says hastily, "No, no, not your son. It’s your husband. He’s been murdered."

So she drops into her chair, hand on her throat, and whispers, "Oh, thank God. I thought you were going to tell me– but he’s all right. Philip. My son. He’s all right, you say?"

And the detective then has to say again, "Yes, ma’am. This isn’t about your son. This is about your husband. He has been–"

"Murdered, yes, you said. But Philip is all right– Thank you."
"But your husband–"
She took a deep breath. "Yes. Walter. Murdered. Yes. Please tell me where, and when."

What’s the difference? Well, first, we learn something about this woman. She loves her son. She doesn’t love her husband, but that’s not because she’s incapable of loving. She’s no sociopath.
 

Read the rest of the article on Edittorrent.

Cross-Genre Writing

This post, from novelist Karen Chance, originally appeared on Penguin{Blog} usa on 4/4/08.

I suppose my last blog post is a good time to talk about endings: specifically genre crossover endings. A lot of books these days are hybrids of several genres. The Cassie Palmer series, for example, appeals mainly to fantasy, mystery and romance fans, with a sprinkling of horror and thriller readers mixed in there for good measure. The question I get asked most frequently is, does trying to please the readers of so many genres, each of which has its own rules and expectations, cause any problems?

Short answer: Oh, yeah.

Long answer: Since one of the biggest bones of contention is how a story ends, let’s use that as an example. And there are no two genres more disparate in that regard than romance and fantasy. In romance, the genre expectation is still the happily-ever-after ending (which is so common that it even has a widely understood abbreviation: HEA). Not that all romance stories conform to this anymore-romance, like most genres, has become more flexible in recent years-but a great many romances do follow the old formula because a great many romance fans still prefer it. In fantasy, happy endings are also the norm and have been for generations. It’s one of the main things that separates fantasy, even dark fantasy, from horror. The problem is that fans of the two genres often have a very different take on how they define the term "happy."

For romance fans, HEA means a Cinderella ending, in which the heroine gets her man and they go on to have many happy years of wedded (or these days, often unwedded) bliss together. Many times, friends of the main protagonist, vague acquaintances and, well, pretty much everybody except the villain of the piece, also live happily ever after. In fantasy . . . not so much.

Take Lord of the Rings for example. In the end, evil is defeated, good triumphs, and Aragorn becomes king. Seems pretty happy, right? Until you look a little more closely. Because Aragorn wasn’t the main protagonist, Frodo was. And what happened to Frodo? A fantasy fan would tell you, probably quite enthusiastically, "he fulfilled his quest! He grew as a person! He became more than he ever thought he could be, and did things that no one else in the story could have done!" HEA, in other words. But a romance fan, if you could tear them away from sighing over a poster of Viggo/Orlando/ assorted pretty, pretty elves long enough to answer, would likely tell you that Frodo got shafted.

I think I can explain this best by showing you, so look into your palantír and witness the following dialogue between a romance fan and a fantasy fan…

Read the rest of the post on Penguin{Blog} usa.

About "The Rules"

This is a cross-posting of a blog entry which originally appeared on The Indie Author Blog on 8/4/09.

I’ve been away [from my blog] because I’ve been judging in this year’s Writer’s Digest Self-Published Books contest, and unlike some other contest judges I know of, don’t think it’s fair to reject any entry after reading only the first paragraph—or less. I read all of the 25 books allotted to me from cover to cover, and went back to re-read certain passages in most of them when compiling my judging notes. I say this not because I’m fishing for compliments on my judge-ery, but because the experience of reading all of those books, in a short period of time, in the context of a contest really opened my eyes to something: strict obedience to The Rules is more likely to ruin your work than breaking them.

You know about The Rules, right? That collection of unofficial, yet oft-posted admonitions purporting to warn fiction writers about the prose and story bugaboos that will result in instant rejection? Things like, "delete all adverbs," "vampire stories don’t sell anymore," and "publishers hate prologues"…ringing any bells?

As we all know, it’s not difficult to find numerous exceptions to any such rule among mainstream, bestselling books. But the response to these rebuttals is invariably some airy statement about how big name authors can get away with that stuff because they have an established fan base, whereas you, a mere beginner in the game, never could. This statement and all its variations are wrong.

Paradoxically, the only distinction between a flawed piece of prose and a flawless one is the question of whether or not the prose sings. In other words, if we feel it does not sing, we say the prose is flawed. It’s usually pretty easy to zoom in on problematic sentences or passages that seem awkward, and if certain aspects of those sentences or passages seem to repeat in other works you judge to be flawed (e.g., heavy use of adverbs), it doesn’t seem like much of a leap to conclude the repeated items are the root of the problem. It seems very logical to conclude that if only those specific items were eliminated, the prose would be flawless. But as it turns out, this is a HUGE leap and it’s NOT logical. There are only two possible reasons for finding broken rules in big-name authors’ books: either the broken rule wasn’t noticed, or else it was noticed but editors deemed it too minor to bother changing.

If a flaw was noticed but left unchanged, the author isn’t necessarily ‘getting away with it.’ Readers notice when prose is awkward, but they’re not generally peeved enough about it to return the book for a refund. Even so, many an established author has found his readership fading right in line with his attention to detail, so breaking The Rules isn’t some automatic privilege of becoming a big-name author. I’m sure anyone reading this can think of at least one former-favorite author whose books you stopped reading because the quality of the work seemed to be slipping, or getting repetitive. It’s not like authors have to toe the line right up until they hit the Times’ bestseller list, but can relax from there on in. Sometimes flaws go uncorrected simply because in terms of time, money and human resources, the publisher’s judgment came down on the side of "leave it alone".

If the so-called flaw wasn’t noticed, that was either due to a simple editorial oversight or because the so-called flaw wasn’t perceived as a flaw at all. In either case, the author still isn’t getting away with anything. The question of whether or not the prose is flawed ultimately comes down to each reader’s individual experience, and if a reader doesn’t like the work, it doesn’t really matter what his specific reasons are. That reader will come away thinking the writing was weak.

When a so-called flaw isn’t perceived by readers as a flaw at all, the work isn’t some exception that proves The Rules. It’s an example of excellent authorship, and excellent authorship isn’t about how many adverbs you use, or whether your story has a prologue, or whether your protagonist is a vampire. Excellent authorship in fiction is about storytelling. It’s about pulling the reader or listener into a world you created and convincing her to care enough about the characters in that world to invest many hours of time and effort on learning more about what happens to them. It’s about engaging the reader or listener so fully that he literally shuts off all awareness of the "real" world around him, whether because he’s immersed in the plot or fascinated by the characters—or both.

The thing is, excellent authorship cannot be defined in any fixed manner; what makes one piece of work wonderful may be entirely different than what makes another piece of work equally good. For example, many people would laud Terry Pratchett for the humor in his Discworld books, but that doesn’t mean that as a rule, all novelists should strive to inject humor into their work. Similarly, many others greatly enjoy the occult elements in Anne Rice’s vampire and witch novels, but that doesn’t mean adding occult elements to your novel will make it a surefire winner.

Conversely, choosing what to leave out of your novel by hewing to The Rules like they’re your religion will not make your novel a surefire winner, either. What it WILL do is drain all the life, personality and originality from your work. In judging, I read many books that were absolutely pristine in terms of following The Rules yet were so boring, predictable or colorless that reading them felt like homework. Many aspiring authors don’t seem to realize this, but an author’s unique "voice", his or her specific style of communicating, is defined by when and how that author breaks The Rules. If you never break The Rules, you will never find or develop your author’s voice. And as a reader, having recently read 25 novels from different authors in rapid succession, I can tell you that I’ll take adverbs, prologues and vampires over boring in my novels any day.

Some of the best work I read broke numerous rules, and in every one of those cases the storytelling was so powerful that I didn’t even notice any rules being broken until much later, when I went back to try and put my finger on the specific qualities that made certain entries so much stronger than others. At that point I had my eye out for The Rules, and having been schooled in them for so many years I suspected I’d find the stronger entries were stronger precisely because those authors managed to avoid breaking The Rules. But I was wrong.

In comparing the greats to the not-so-greats, there was plenty of rule-breaking happening on both sides of the fence. The only difference was, in the greats I didn’t notice the rule-breaking during my first read-through, whereas in the not-so-greats I HAD noticed. It became very clear to me that what separates successful prose from flawed prose isn’t the question of whether or not the author uses a prologue, adverbs, vampire characters, or breaks any other rule: it’s whether the author succeeded in pulling me in. Period. But since there’s no simple way to explain how to pull a reader in, no universal method or style that works for all writers in all genres at all times, we tend to find other, easier mile markers upon which to hang our hats. Hence, The Rules are born. Hence, huge populations of writers become convinced that good fiction writing is about following rules, not storytelling. I think this must be because it’s very comforting to believe there’s some secret formula or magic method that invariably leads to success, and very scary to think there isn’t.

In my critiques of those 25 books, my notes on how the books could be improved had to do with things like characterization, phrasing too awkward to be easily understood, story arc, plot logic and pacing. I didn’t advise anyone to kill the adverbs, strike the prologue, or eliminate the undead from their stories. I’d already read plenty of work that had done all those things and more in service (or servitude) to The Rules, yet still failed to hold my rapt attention. In the end, the books that piqued my interest and held it were the ones I judged most promising, regardless of The Rules. Plenty of these needed a good edit, a little work on pacing or character, or improvement in some other area of mechanics, but all of those things are easy to fix. If your story lacks personality, originality, or imagination, neither I nor anyone else can tell you how to fix those problems. It’s like telling a musician to play better.

If you must have rules, I’d say these are the only two you need:

1. If it weakens, or adds nothing to the work, change it.

2. If it strengthens the work, leave it alone.

I think you’ll find that these two rules alone cover everything from spelling and grammar to plot and pacing, and that there’s no flaw you can think of in a piece of prose that can’t be fixed through the application of one or the other of these two rules. Even murkier areas like character, theme and tone are covered by these two rules, because every choice you make in drawing character, conveying theme and setting tone will weaken, add nothing to, or strengthen the work overall.

But as I’m sure you’ve noticed, these rules are fairly useless unless you can tell the difference between what weakens/adds nothing to, or strengthens, a piece of work. And if you can already tell the difference, then you don’t need these rules to begin with. Unfortunately, there’s no rubric to which you can refer on this, it comes down to your gut and the reactions of your readers. Even spelling and grammar aren’t so clear-cut as you might think; believe it or not, there are times when purposeful misspelling and incorrect grammar really can strengthen a story; just ask Burroughs or Vonnegut.

In the end, the inherent problem with conventional wisdom is that if you follow it, you end up with a conventional product for conventional people. And when was the last time you heard a novel praised for being conventional?

 

April L. Hamilton is the founder and Editor In Chief of Publetariat.

Publisher Spotlight: Interview With Flying Pen Press Publisher David Rozansky

David Rozansky is the founder and publisher for Flying Pen Press and its numerous imprints. In this interview with Publetariat founder April L. Hamilton, David discusses how and why he got into book publishing, what it’s like to work with Flying Pen as an author, and his opinions on matters related to the economics of publishing and self-publishing.

ALH: Following over two decades of experience as a writer, journalist, and then magazine publisher, you decided to launch Flying Pen Press. Why?

DR: There are two forces at work here.

As I entered publishing, I started with magazines back in the early 1990s, mostly because it was easier for a struggling writer to launch a magazine on a shoestring than to start a book publishing house, but my real interest was in publishing books. Then, not too long ago. it became possible to launch a fully functional book-publishing house with no capital outlay. I had the knowledge, the passion and the contacts, so launching a book-publishing house was a natural progression of my career.

The other factor is that in 20 or so years of writing, I often came upon unfair or predatory practices among publishers. I wanted to give my fellow writers a place where they would be respected, and where their work was the reason for being [in] business. Once it became practical to launch a book-publishing venture, I felt like I had an obligation to do so.

ALH: Flying Pen initially faced some serious skepticism from authors who believe a publisher which doesn’t offer sizable advances isn’t a legitimate publisher at all, but when the Harper Studio imprint launched last year, it was with the announcement of the imprint’s intention to forego author advances entirely in favor of a profit-sharing approach to author compensation. It seems Flying Pen was a bit ahead of the curve on this new trend of reducing author advances and looking for alternative compensation schemes. How does Flying Pen compensate its authors?

DR: Before I answer, I would like to say I don’t see any reversal of any trends. There have always been small publishers that could not afford to pay advances. An advance requires a great deal of speculative capital on the part of the publisher. If the book does not earn enough to clear its advance, that publisher is out of money. The larger publishers have enough cash reserves to entice the bestselling authors with large advances, and with their large title lists, they can afford to gamble. But smaller houses just can’t take that risk, because it only takes once for a poorly performing title that does not earn back its advance and then that company is bankrupt.

I also believe that writers should stand behind their work, as I always have with my own writing. That means sharing the risk that the writing will not find a following with readers. I don’t mind giving writers a better-than-average share of the rewards for sharing that risk, but authors that demand an advance before they have proven themselves with a fan following are telling me that they are not sure of their writing, and authors who are well established in the trade with a large number of readers have told me that they prefer more royalties over any advance.

When an author has enough of a fan following that bestseller status is almost all but assured, then advances become a way for large publishers to convince a writer that they are more dedicated to the book’s success than their competitor. But small publishers just don’t have the money to play that, and the large publishers, in this economy, have been bitten pretty hard by their overestimations and are shying away from big advances.

I have instituted a fairly innovative royalty schedule, however, one that no one else has tried. Instead of paying a royalty that is based on cover price or on net sales, I have set it up so that authors earn royalties based on shares of gross profits of each book sold. Gross profits is based on the net sale price less printing costs and some marketing costs that both publisher and writer agree on, such as review copies printed or special ads.

This changes the publishers-author dynamic a bit. Instead of seeing authors as vendors of content, where we try to drive the price for content down with creative accounting, Flying Pen Press becomes a partner with the author. As a typical example, the author earns 100 shares, Flying Pen Press earns 115 shares, and the cover designer and the contracted book editor earn about 30 shares each. The only way that Flying Pen Press can make more money is if the author makes more money, since we all get a cut of the same profit numbers. This falls in line with my philosophy of giving as much respect as possible to authors.

We are now playing around with the idea of giving authors profit shares of the company, as well, over and above their royalties, provided they continue to write books each year and they communicate regularly with their fan bases. Once we have more cash flow, my plans are to offer authors health benefits, disability insurance, and other perks that are sorely lacking among my competitors, but that will have to come only once we have developed a rich and successful catalog.

We also pull from our authors for staff positions. Authors make the best editors, I have found, and as an author-centric publisher, it pays to bring on my fellow writers as key decision makers.

ALH: On your website, under submission guidelines, it says Flying Pen has "an immediate interest in science fiction, fantasy, and mystery novels, and in poker books and role-playing-game books." Is Flying Pen evolving into a genre-specific imprint, or do you have plans to broaden your range in acquisitions?

DR: While we have a strong interest right now in those particular genres, it is because we have developed inroads into those markets. Our acquisitions interests, however, are in most all fiction genres except for erotica, children’s, young adult or poetry, and our nonfiction interests can include most anything except new age or religious titles.

I have always said that Flying Pen Press would determine its own direction, regardless of what my interests are. That is, it is easier to market books to people who are already familiar with your company than to try and beat a path into a new genre. Two of our first three books were science fiction novels, and then last year, we decided to fill the catalog with science fiction because the World Science Fiction Convention came to Denver, our home town. As a result, we have strong roots with science-fiction bookstores and readers, and so it is less expensive to operate along that path. Thus, our predilection for science fiction. As we draw on our authors for staff, the staff comes form this pool of science fiction writers, and that causes an even deeper association with that genre.

Having said that, we are interested in all commercially viable fiction. Key to that is the author’s fan base and quality of writing, not the genre.

When it comes to nonfiction, it is a little different. Our first nonfiction book is a poker rulebook. Finding nonfiction writers is harder, but marketing nonfiction is very easy. You don’t have to explain what the book is about, the reader gets it from the title. There is less of a "beaten path" associated with what subjects we can market, and more of matching the reader’s needs to the writer’s ability to fill it.

We do have specific imprints for certain nonfiction imprints.

Game Day is the imprint for game books and books about games. This includes poker and role-playing games. It can also include books about video games, board games, fantasy sports, collectible card games, party games and children’s games. We also look for books about casino games and gambling, as well as books about the gaming and gambling industries and books on game theory. Puzzle books also fall under this imprint.

Flying Piggybank Press is our business imprint. In this title, we are addressing the subjects of business management, small-business operations, personal finance, and career management. If we can get a juicy corporation expose, we’d love to have it.

Flying Pen Press Aviation is an imprint for aviation and aerospace topics, including fiction, how-to, technical, textbook, history, pilot travelogue, and any other subject that we can market to pilots and aviation enthusiasts.

Traveling Pen Press titles are travelogues. Such books don’t sell well, but I spent three years as an expatriate in Central America, and I have a soft spot for such writing.

Flying Pen Press Travel Guides is self-explanatory. We want to publish travel books. We don’t have the operating capital to compete with Fodors or Lonely Planet, but we can easily market quirky travel guides. I would say that being in Colorado, we find that there is a strong need for ski-resort guides that is not being met. One of the big challenges with travel guides, at least for Flying Pen Press, is that we publish in black and white only, and these books tend to rely on color photographs rather extensively.

We want to publish some regional titles. Flying Pen Press Colorado focuses on anything about the state. Flying Pen Press Southwest focuses on the Southwest U.S., and Flying Pen Press Rocky Mountain West addresses the mountainous states.

The one imprint that means the most to me is The Press for Humanitarian Causes. I spent three years as a volunteer in Central America during the 1980s, and I learned that there are many people in this world who are suffering but for the need to be heard. This imprint gives those people a voice, either written by the people in those places, or the volunteers who help them. Flying Pen Press keeps none of its profit shares from these titles but instead donates them to the volunteer humanitarian organizations helping the people who are the subject of the book. I believe that the freedom of the press goes a long way to bringing hope, peace and freedom to the people of the world, and this is my way of giving back to the community.

ALH: Within the preferred genres, what is it that Flying Pen looks for in its acquisitions?

DR: As you can see, we have a lot of preferred genres.

In fiction, we want a really good story well told, by an author who has developed a fan following and communicates with those fans regularly. This holds true for narrative nonfiction and memoirs as well.

In nonfiction, we want topics that appeal to readers by an expert that can actively instruct and answer questions about the subject matter. And we are looking for strong, ethical, thorough journalism.

I can’t really say that when it comes to "what we are looking for" in our acquisitions, I can’t say that we are really much different than other commercial publishers. We want books that can be sold in bookstores, of the quality such stores require.

Flying Pen Press doesn’t publish books, per se. We publish authors, and it is the attitude, skill and passion of the author that is more relevant in our acquisition process. We expect authors to write well and professionally, but we also expect them to write on a regular basis. If an author can write one, two or more books a year, we are far more likely to publish them than someone who will turn out only one brilliant book.

And also, Flying Pen Press does not buy manuscripts, we buy readers. If there is a demonstrated passion for the author’s work, then we are more likely to see value in that material.

ALH: What kind of experience can an author expect after signing with Flying Pen, in terms of editorial, cover design, marketing and support services?

DR: Flying Pen Press is a commercial publisher, so we do all of that. We are a virtual company, in that all of the staff work from their home offices.

How much we need to work on a book after the author turns in the manuscript depends on the book and the author, mostly, but we try our best to make the book the best it can be.

Generally, we bring on a book editor as a contractor that is best suited to working with the author, who agrees to work for shares of gross profit. We have found that this creates a fairly close working relationship with the author in the prepublication stage. However, we want to bring more of this in house because we find that freelance editors are not paying close attention to the post-publication marketing of the book.

In any event, I have a tight hand on the editorial side, and I am always ready to step in if there is any disruption in the editorial process.

As to covers, Laura Givens is our art director and designs the covers. She is an excellent artist in her own right, and as she has been designing book covers for some time, she has a fairly competent stable of artists to draw from. We engage the author in the cover design stage, but in the end, Flying Pen Press has artistic control over the cover design, and we have found that some authors nitpick at the cover so badly that it becomes a negative influence on the artwork quality, so sometimes we have to say, enough is enough. The author’s involvement, when reasonable, is very important to us, though, and we show authors every sketch and draft as the cover develops.

As to marketing, we do what we can. We primarily market on the Internet, like most small publishers do. We produce a catalog, and we call on bookstores. However, as the gap between author and reader closes, it becomes imperative that the author do more of the marketing. We focus on training authors on how to attract fans, how to connect with them, and how to communicate with them. We are establishing new routines where Flying Pen Press helps authors with blogging, newsletters and publicity, to help give the author more time to write, but ultimately, the readers follow the author, not the publisher.

I am not sure what you have in mind when you ask about support services. I forge personal friendships with each and every author, and I treat them as if they were family. I give them any support I can, and they have an open invitation to knock on my front door at any time, even at my home…which is also my office, being as Flying Pen Press has a virtual office. I want writers to succeed and to be respected, because those are the seeds of my own prosperity and self worth. There are no stockholders at Flying Pen Press, no bottom line, no ego. In my mind, as a publisher, I work for the authors, not the other way around. I give whatever support I can, though I cannot send company jets, pay for transcontinental book tours or put Oprah on speed dial. But I will be there with my truck when the author moves, and come with food when the author is sick, and clasp the author’s hand whenever we meet. I can only offer my friendship as a support service, but I can think of no support more powerful.

ALH: To what extent does Flying Pen employ, or plan to employ, Print on Demand and ebook technologies?

DR: We leverage Lightning Source, a print-on-demand printer owned and operated by Ingram, and we turn all of our books into ebooks, although we are still experiencing the learning curve on ebook technical matters.

Every day, more publishers are turning to Lightning Source. It is practically cornering the market on Long Tail publishing. Lightning Source provides more than just the highest quality print-on-demand technology in plants in the U.S. and U.K., they provide distribution through Ingram, Baker & Taylor, NACSCORP (a distributor serving college bookstores) and all the major wholesalers in the U.K. to serve all of Europe. More plants will be opening in countries around the globe. They also serve Amazon and the online arm of Barnes and Noble. Lightning Source allows Flying Pen Press to set our discounts however we want, so that we can offer standard terms to the trade. Lightning Source also handles returns, which is critical when marketing books to the trade.

In return for a higher print cost per copy, Flying Pen Press is freed from the costs of warehousing and the costs of inventory risk. No book is ever printed that is not wanted. Books ship directly from the Lightning Source Plant (wherever it may be) to the store, or more often than not, directly to the reader. Flying Pen Press never has to invest capital in a print run in the hopes that the readers will buy all the copies. This makes it easy to invest effort in new, untried authors, and to keep publishing their work even when their first title does not take off right away. It also allows us to make more profit with niche titles that may not necessarily find a large audience.

Should we ever get a large order, Lightning Source immediately sends our file to an offset printer, and the print savings are passed on to Flying Pen Press. Lower print costs increase gross profits, which helps increase the author’s royalties, because it is all based on shares of gross profits. That is the beauty of print-on-demand: it can use either offset or electronic printing presses, and never is a copy wasted. Waste in this business is very expensive, so it is no wonder that even the biggest publishers are turning to print-on-demand technology.

As to ebooks, it’s clear that the public is now hungry for more titles on more screens. Because we are more focused on having authors build their careers than on selling copies of a single title, we encourage authors to allow free ebook distribution for about half their books, or at least for their first few titles. Then, when the author has created a name for herself, it is a good time to begin selling ebooks for profit. This is always a controversial subject, and we follow the author’s lead when it comes to ebook pricing, but Flying Pen Press is not one of those publishers that demands that profits must stand in the way of the author building a fan base; we see that as counterproductive.

ALH: In recent publishing news, we’ve learned of an author who landed a contract with Harper Collins after acquiring a sizable following for the Podiobooks version of his novel, and another who got a 2-book deal with Simon & Schuster after self-publishing his book as Kindle edition and promoting it himself. It seems hardly a week goes by without similar self-publisher success stories; as a publisher, do you feel this is an exceptional blip on the radar, or the beginning of a new trend in acquisitions?

DR: Again, I would say neither. Small presses and self-publication have always been a great way for authors to build their fan base to a point that large publishers make offers. This is as old as commercial publishing itself. It only seems different now that self-publishing is so economical, but it is neither new nor a mere fad. Rather, it is the normal means of getting noticed.

It is important to note that getting published by a big name publisher is not the ultimate prize. After the publisher, distributors have to be talked into warehousing the book, then sale reps have to be convinced that the book is the best in the catalog, and then the bookstores have to take to it, and finally, the reader has to buy it in large quantities or it all comes tumbling down, with the author left in a pile of failure.

However, if the author takes care of her end of business first, by convincing enough readers to buy the book that there becomes a subtle buzz for the book, then everyone’s job at the bigger publishers becomes easy. And because of this, a successful (and I need to stress *successful*) self-published book stands a very good chance of snaring the big marketing dollars–even if it’s only self-published as an ebook or podcast.

ALH: Is Flying Pen open to acquiring the rights to successful self-published books?

DR: Yes and no. We are certainly open to acquiring a successful book of any type, but successful means that it has a following, not that it looks nice and has the pages in order. I have had many self-published books, ebooks, web books, audio books and print-shop books land on my desk. And so far, all but the print-shop book has been deplorable. The grammar is usually awful, spelling errors are rampant, not thought at all is given to style, plots have large open holes, Characters are stilted, and there is no skill or talent in the writing. The reviews on Amazon–if there are any–are often negative. When I Google the author’s name, nothing comes up. The core market of the author’s friends and family have been mined out years ago, making it impossible to ignite the spark of buzz marketing that is so crucial to book marketing.

For some reason I cannot fathom, many authors turn to self-publication as a way of sidestepping the vetting process. But self-publication means that the book has to be more attractive to readers than what a large publishing house puts out, and so a self-published book requires more vetting, at the author’s own expense. An editor *must* be hired. The author’s own online marketing efforts must be ten times more intense than her traditionally published peers.

Self-publication is often seen by authors as a way of avoiding the torrential demands made by commercial publishers, but in reality, it is actually a deeper immersion into the tempest that is the publishing world. Those writers who are prepared for the tempest have a great challenge before them, with a great reward waiting for them if they succeed, but self-published writers who think they are above the tempest will find themselves drowning in the whirlpool of an apathetic market.

Flying Pen Press will never want the self-published author whose attitude or record indicates that the author is burned out on marketing and promotion and just wants a commercial publisher to take over. Instead, it must be clear that the author has mastered these tasks with vigor before a self-published book becomes the least bit interesting to a commercial publishing house like Flying Pen Press.

Unfortunately, every publishing house is looking for the successful self-published books that have proven themselves. Chances are, a small house like Flying Pen Press cannot compete when one of these rare gems comes along. So Flying Pen Press is more likely to work with unpublished authors, or with midlist authors who have grown tired of the ivory-tower publishing establishment in New York City.

ALH: Can you tell us something about Flying Pen’s latest release, and what led you to acquire this particular book?

DR: Our latest release is actually part of our first acquisition.

The latest book from Flying Pen Press is Riders of the Mapinguari, the final novel in the Feral World series. Here is [some] information:

Riders of the Mapinguari.
The third novel of The Feral World series.
By Gaddy Bergmann.

Riders of the Mapinguari by Gaddy Bergmann is the final novel in The Feral World trilogy, a post-apocalyptic odyssey set 3,000 years in the future. Humanity has barely survived a near-extinction-level event – the collision of a major asteroid with Earth in the middle of the Twenty-First Century.
Riders of the Mapinguari takes The Feral World in a radically new direction. Blake and his friends have traveled through the Great Plains and are living peacefully in the Warmland, when they are attacked by an enemy quite unlike any they have ever faced before: the Terran army. Poised to conquer the Warmland, the Terrans not only greatly outnumber the natives, but they also have hundreds of mapinguari – giant beasts that can overpower anyone who would oppose them. Blake and his people must face them, though, if they hope to save not only themselves, but the entire Warmland. The Feral World trilogy is unique in offering an optimistic view of post-apocalyptic society, which has come to consist of local tribes that depend on hunting and gathering. Gaddy Bergmann (Denver) is an ecologist and zoologist, and he carefully crafted a world where the biosphere develops naturally in the absence of humanity’s misguided management of the planet.

Biography:
Gaddy Bergmann is a naturalist and scientist. He has performed research in both ecology and microbiology. He has also worked in education, teaching elementary, secondary, and university students in the subjects of math, science, and composition. An admirer of animals and wildlife since childhood, he was inspired to write /The Feral World/ books by the beauty of the natural wonders he saw all around him.

I first met Gaddy in October, 2006, at Mile Hi Con, a science fiction convention in Denver. I had just started looking into Lightning Source and realized that my dreams of book publishing without any capital outlay were now feasible, but I did not know if any writers would appreciate the no-advance, shares-of-profit payment schedule. So I went to the first conference where I might find writers to see what the response would be. I put a sign in my hat that said: "Writers and Editors Wanted." I arranged a pitch session at the convention, expecting no one to show.

Instead, I was surrounded for the entire weekend by aspiring writers, and the pitch session brought was well attended. I went to Mile Hi Con to get a feel for interest, but I left with eight manuscripts to review. One often hears from publishers that unsolicited manuscripts are usually dreadful, but somehow I was very lucky–of the eight manuscripts, six were very well written and worth publishing.

Gaddy Bergmann was the first person to hand me a complete manuscript, in a very large three-ring binder. I was drawn into his world of rubbletowns and feral dogs and Bebelishi culture. But it was much too long, twice too long. Fortunately, the novel had a major plot shift exactly at the halfway point, and Bergmann agreed to split it into two books, which required very little effort at all. Bergmann also mentioned that he was working on the sequel. This resulted in a three-book contract: Migration of the Kamishi (ISBN 978-0-9795889-1-4), Trials of the Warmland (ISBN 978-0-9795889-4-5) and Riders of the Mapinguari (ISBN 978-0-09795889-5-2).
 

I would like to end this interview by inviting people to ask me questions about the publishing industry. My email address is Publisher@FlyingPenPress.com, and I can often be found on Twitter: @DavidRozansky. I am happy to take calls at 303-375-0499, but please keep in mind that the nature of a virtual office means that I do not keep any regular business hours.

 

Learn more about Flying Pen Press at the publisher’s web page, http://FlyingPenPress.com, and subscribe to the Flying Pen Press newsletter by sending an email to newsletter-subscribe@FlyingPenPress.com (Flying Pen Press does not share its newsletter subscription list with anyone for any reason, and will only use it to send regular newsletters, press releases, and occasional special offers for Flying Pen Press titles). 

The Fine Art of Feedback

This post, from bestselling novelist Joe Finder, originally appeared on the Writing Tips section of his website in July of this year and is reprinted in its entirety here with his permission.

     VANISHED hits bookstores in a month. As we get closer and closer to the publication date, I get more excited about finally putting the book in readers’ hands. There’s nothing like that excitement of seeing people read something I wrote, and few professional endeavors ever pay off with such a visible reward.

     Yet there’s a certain amount of nervousness, too, a kind of stage fright. Even after having published nine books (eight novels), I still feel it. I’ve learned the truth of Edna St. Vincent Millay’s remark, "A person who publishes a book willfully appears before the populace with his pants down. If it is a good book nothing can hurt him. If it is a bad book nothing can help him."

     I’ve come to value criticism. But I admit, I used to take umbrage, I used to be offended or even hurt — until I realized that anything that doesn’t kill me makes me stronger, and that criticism/feedback/suggestions are the way my work gets better. Now I value it. Getting mad at criticism is like getting mad at a friend for giving you honest advice when you asked for it. Don’t get mad at criticism. Be grateful.

     We write to be read. We write for readers, not merely for ourselves, just as the village storyteller in the old days would refine and improve his stories by noticing what made people yawn and what made them jump or gasp or smile. Any person or business interested in producing a quality product goes looking for feedback, the way Hollywood holds test screenings or Coke does market testing. Good feedback is about making the end product better.

     But every writer – every artist – struggles with this, so I thought I’d spend this month’s writing newsletter on the issue of how best to solicit and process feedback.

     Let me start by saying that my ability to change something in a book, once it’s published, is minimal. Unless a book is libelous or dangerous, a publisher won’t pull it off the shelves to correct it, and even the ability to make changes between one printing and the next is pretty limited. Once the galley proofs leave my office, the book’s pretty well locked. So I have to make sure that what my publishers get is the best version of the book I can give them, and that involves asking for and processing a great deal of feedback before I turn the book in. But the criticism I get on one book does help me write future books, because I’m constantly trying to improve, and writers learn to write each new book as they go.
 

Ten Tips for Soliciting and Processing Feedback – Plus One

1. Don’t ask for feedback on material that’s not ready. Writing, in this sense, is like cooking. There’s no point in asking someone to taste a dish before you’ve finished cooking it, and there’s rarely any point in asking someone to read a work before you’re happy with it. The one exception might be when you know something is missing, but can’t figure out what it is – “What does this soup need?” – and in these cases, writers’ workshops can be useful. Two corollaries to this are: 1a) Don’t let your friends/spouse/parents/etc. read your drafts before the work is ready and 1b) Don’t ask people to read the same material more than once, unless they ask to do so.

2. Don’t give everyone’s feedback the same weight. The opinion of some is more valuable than others. Criticism from my editor or my agent, for example, is like taking a watch in for repairs; my editor and agent have specialized knowledge and an understanding of my work over time. Other criticism might not be as meaningful to me. How do I know which feedback to pay attention to? It’s a gut instinct, something that tells me how carefully someone’s read the book, how well they understood what I was trying to do, and whether they have a valid opinion about whether I succeeded.

On this subject, while it’s nice to get good reviews, I don’t learn as much from them as I do from other sources of feedback. Reviews seldom give me much new information; I’ve lived with the book longer than any reviewer has. I already know all the strengths and weaknesses. I’m like a carpenter — I know where the joints are, where the cracks are. You can’t look for validation from critics. The only thing that counts is your audience, whether they buy your books and keep buying them and recommend them to their friends, because that tells you whether you’re entertaining people. I’m not writing for critics; I’m writing for readers. I’m writing to entertain.

3. Don’t expect feedback – especially from reviews — to give you solutions. Hollywood holds test screenings in front of focus groups, surveying the audience for their reactions. I think of criticism in much the same way. At these screenings, producers ask the audience members what they liked and what they didn’t; they don’t ask for suggestions at how to fix the movie. That’s the filmmakers’ job.

When Paramount screened the great thriller Fatal Attraction for test audiences, they hissed when Alex Forrest (the wacko played by Glenn Close) killed herself at the end. They wanted her to get her comeuppance. So Paramount changed the ending. If you’ve seen it, you know what happened. (If you haven’t seen it, you should). Was it wrong for Paramount to change the ending based on a test screening’s reaction? I don’t think so. The changed ending is far more satisfying – not just to me, but to the many millions who loved that movie. Anyway, the test screeners didn’t tell Paramount how to change the ending. All they did was tell the studio they didn’t like the ending. The writers and producers had to solve that problem themselves.

Likewise, readers who offer criticism usually don’t have a solution; all they can do is identify the problem, and say what they don’t like. Here too it’s a matter of learning to discern the quiet voice within. Advice that resonates will click with me; I’ll recognize that I myself had a problem with a particular character, or plot device, or passage. Trust your instincts. Listen to that inner voice.

4. Know what your goals were when you were writing. That is, know whom your readers should be rooting for, what’s supposed to be a red herring, and what you want your readers to understand about the action at any given point. If an early reader says, “I don’t understand why Character X does that,” you should know whether this is something you need to fix, or the way it’s supposed to be.

5. Don’t ask too many people for feedback. If you ask a dozen people for opinions, you’ll get a dozen different opinions, and I guarantee that at least two of those opinions will diametrically oppose each other. Keep your feedback group small and manageable: three, four, five people at the very most. I once received a draft of a short story from someone I knew only slightly, who had apparently sent it to his entire address book; he asked everyone for feedback. I politely declined.

6. Don’t take it personally. Nothing is more personal than this beautiful manuscript you’ve sweated over for however many months, but your first readers don’t see this as a piece of your flesh and blood. What they see is a piece of work, separate from you, that could use a good trim or a new coat of paint or possibly a second floor. They don’t mean that you need a good trim or a different shade of lipstick or a better personality. (Except when they do.)

7. Pay particular attention to comments you get from more than one reader. If two or three people have the same question about a plot point, or the same criticism about a character’s decision, chances are that it’s a problem. I once had two early readers ask me how a particular character got from point A to point B. I was sure I’d explained it, but when I went back to look at the manuscript, I discovered I’d sent them a marked-up draft that was missing several chapters. Whoops!

8. Take some time to consider each criticism or question before you make changes in the manuscript. If you automatically make changes in response to every criticism or query you get, you may wind up changing things you don’t want to change, or creating inconsistencies within your manuscript. Keep a master list of recommendations, questions and issues your first readers bring up, and tackle your revisions as a whole, rather than piecemeal.

9. Don’t ask for feedback when what you want is praise. This is a tough one. If you ask for honest criticism, you’ll get it, and you need to be prepared for it. In fact, people asked for criticism will read with the goal of finding mistakes and elements that need improvement, because that’s what you’ve asked them to do. Don’t ask people to do this if you’re not prepared to hear their recommendations.

10. Pay as much attention to the praise as to the criticism. It’s so much easier to hear the criticism than it is to hear the praise, but the praise is just as important. In fact, I’d say the praise is even more important for the writer who’s already thinking about the next book. I need to know what readers especially like, so I can try to recreate that in future work. I still get emails from readers about how much they loved the character of Audrey, in COMPANY MAN. Audrey was a real stretch for me, and I was nervous about how she would be received – but kind readers have told me what they liked about her, and I’ve used that feedback to create other characters whom I hope are equally likeable.

And last, but most important:

11. Trust your own judgment most. Feedback’s important. Feedback’s necessary. But it’s your vision, your work, and your name on the book. No book pleases everyone. What ultimately matters is that you like it, that you’re happy with it, and that you’re proud to put it in readers’ hands.

     I’m proud of VANISHED, and sincerely thank all of the book’s early readers. I look forward to hearing what you think of it, and will thank everyone who writes to give me an opinion (joe@josephfinder.com), even if it’s criticism rather than praise.
 

Visit Joe Finder’s website for more of his monthly Writing Tips, which you can also receive in the form of a monthly newsletter when you sign up for a free subscription